Thursday, June 2, 2011

Newport Beach's Tax Delinquencies

Well...in an effort to embarrass taxpayers into paying their past due taxes, the State of California's Franchise Tax Board releases it's list of 250 worst offenders.

Click here for the searchable database...

But for you interested in seeing who's on the hook in Newport Beach, here you go...
  • The Sonos Group, Newport Beach, $1.5 million, October 2010
  • John P. Honiotes, Newport Beach, $861,000, August 2008
  • Supriti Soni, Corona Del Mar, $499,000, March 2009
  • Nobuhito Suzuki, $313,828 Newport Beach, September 2008
The honor of Orange County's top debtor to the State of California Steven Bren of Laguna Beach, son of Newport Beach based Irvine Co. Chairman Don Bren.

But knowing firsthand how the Franchise Tax Board handles these types of matters, I'm sure all of these have already been resolved.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Newport Beach Restaurant Closures

Considering that most, if not all, of my family members have owned restaurants and being the Accountant for Newport Beach restaurant in the past, I know it really takes a lot to get a restaurant shut down by the Health Department...so take a gander at what's closed in the past 60 days.

BALBOA YACHT CLUB 1801 BAYSIDE DR , CORONA DEL MAR

PLACE, THE 2920 E COAST HWY , CORONA DEL MAR

RUBYS DINER 1 BALBOA PIER , NEWPORT BEACH

Only 3 in the past 60 days...not too bad.

If you want to see the entire County's click here.

How to Buy a Newport Beach Mayor

Ok...this article originally showed up in the Newport Beach Independent...but was edited to leave out the best part...so...

Here's to blogging your opinion.

You cannot blame the Full-Time Lifeguards for their $154k a year average compensation package.

Nor can you blame that retired 51 year old Lifeguard from getting his $108k a year pension pay, for the rest of his life.

I mean, you can’t fault them for asking for it right? It’s up to the City Council to give, or not to give.

Just like if my 4 ½ year old daughter asks me to borrow my Harley. It’s up to me if I say yes or no right?

Well, the previous City Councils, who when asked if the Lifeguards could have the same pensions as the Police and Fire receive, would just laugh and would give them Sunglasses or Suntan lotion. And the Lifeguards would go away happy, as if they had just received bars of gold.

But this time was different. This time, former Councilman Tod Ridgeway was going to be gone, former Councilman Dick Nichols was up for re-election, and former Councilman Steve Bromberg had been off the dais for almost a year, all vehemently against any such Police/Fire-like pensions for the Lifeguards. The Lifeguards never had the votes to get a generous Pension approved.

No, this time when the Lifeguard’s contract was up in the summer for 2006 they knew what they possibly had on their hands and they waited. Waited for Tod Ridgeway to term out, waited for Dick Nichol’s re-election bid, and waited a Union/Pension friendly City Council.

So the Lifeguard Management Union, along with the Firefighter Union, spent $31,807.65 on their slate of candidates. The Lifeguards even walked precincts, knocked on doors trying to pitch their candidates…and guess what?

Every one of the Lifeguard/Fire Union endorsed candidates won (the Barbara Venezia/Leslie Daigle race was different because they endorsed BOTH).

So after the November 2006 City Council race was over, the negotiations restarted in earnest and surprise, surprise (in your best Gomer Pyle voice), on March 13, 2007, the new Newport Beach City Council, the new Union-loving City Council, voted 5-2 in favor of give the full-time Lifeguards the Retirement benefit of 3%@50.

And they made it retroactive to July 2006.

Talk about a gift of public funds, all in exchange for what…walking precincts? But this is where it gets a bit weird…

A very connected, and EXTREMELY reliable source told me, when he asked then-newly elected Councilman Mike Henn, why would he do such a thing? How could he possibly vote in favor of giving Newport Beach’s Lifeguards such juicy benefits and pensions that EVERYONE knew could not be sustained.

Now-Mayor Mike Henn responded, how could he not? After all, they had walked precincts for him, they donated money to him, and they helped him get elected. He felt like he owed it to them to give them this juicy pension.

Let me repeat.

Now-Mayor Mike Henn felt like he owed giving the Full-Time Lifeguards the 3%@50 pension for helping him get elected.

The Lifeguards essentially bike Henny to him, bkjddought his vote.

And if that 51 year old recently retired lifeguard lives until the age of 80 years old, his thank you present will be around $3,132,000.00.

So here is where I apologize for some (not all) of the…um…not-nice things I have written about Councilmembers Steve Rosansky and Leslie Daigle in the past because they were to two no votes, back in 2007, who knew that this type of gift of public funds would be unsustainable. Now keep in mind that in the 2006 election, Steve Rosansky was not up for re-election and Leslie Daigle had been victim of that dreaded “Dual Endorsement” for her re-election bid.

So from the March 13, 2007 City Council minutes, Leslie Daigle said that she “expressed concern that the pension benefits will have a fiscal impact beyond this budget year…that she does not support the policy change.”

At the time Mayor, Steve Rosansky then followed that “he will vote against the contract because of the 3%@50...and that it was given to safety personnel at a time when the stock market was rising and the cost of funding these plans was very low, but conditions have changed. The tide is turning in the State as far as providing enhanced pension benefits, and this is not the appropriate time to move against that trend.”

Of course, completely ignoring the common sense and fiscal prudence coming from Daigle and Rosansky, permanent City Employee Don Webb, of the “all the City Employees deserve their pensions” fame, moved to approve…and the rest is history, viral, and whatever else you want to call the Local/State/National/International news that the Newport Beach Full Time Lifeguards have…um…”enjoyed.”

So…let that be a lesson for all you amateur Politicos. If you want to get $3 million dollars for not working (assuming you live to 80 years old), wait for that perfect storm and do what the full time Lifeguards did.

Walk some precincts, knock on some doors, spend some big dough, and WHAMO! You’ll get that friendly City Council who will vote for your gift of public funds…just because they owe it to ya.

Newport Beach Lifeguards

Wow. That Newport Beach Lifeguards story really went crazy huh?

What started off as a follow up to Barbara Venezia's story in the OC Register, kind of blew up after sending it to my buddy Brian Calle over at the Register.

Here's my original column.

Then the OC Register picked it up here, Here and here

From here it went viral

Bill Handel on KFI even talked about it here at the 15:27 mark.

Here are a couple of blogs who also picked up my story in the NB Indy.

http://capoliticalnews.com/blog_post/show/8494

http://sweetness-light.com/archive/newport-beach-lifeguards-get-200k-a-year (which many other bloggers referred to)

http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/May2011_2.html (halfway down)

Pretty cool huh?

My Wrong Career Choice

Back in grade school, high school, and college, I surfed a lot. I also swam a lot and was a junior lifeguard, but not for very long.

Why?

Because there is no way my father would have let me pursue that kind of stuff as a career. You see, he was a Civil Engineer, with his Master’s Degree. Shoot, my mom even told me once that he would have gotten his Doctorate had I not been born…but I digress…

So I had to study, study, and then study some more. In the summer, when I wasn’t surfing or swimming, I’d be studying. And now today, I run the books for mom and pops as well as for $100 million dollar companies.

But he primarily kept my nose in the books because back then, being a lifeguard could never be a career, could never pay well, and could never lead to good things. How could it right?

Well…fast forward to 2011 and the City of Newport Beach.

City Manager Dave Kiff, with his budget slashing Conan the Barbarian Axe, is proposing to reduce the full time Lifeguards from 13 to 9. And some people in the City are actually upset at this…even my good friend Barbara Venezia wrote about this from the Lifeguard’s point of view in the OC Register.

So let me inject my spin into this Safety vs. Pension Lifeguard argument.

But let me start somewhere else.

Do you know that the top paying LIFEGUARD, with benefits, received over $210,000?

The next highest paid LIFEGUARD, with benefits, $203,481.76?

In fact, out of the 14 full-time LIFEGUARDS on payroll in 2010, the poorest one received with benefits…wait for it…$98,160.65.

The average salary, with benefits, for those 14 LIFEGUARDS, was $154,857.95. And that includes $400 each a year for sun screen…

Is that a lot?

Ok, so what do they do for that money?

Today just happens to be a very warm day. So are those guys out saving lives? Sure they are, but there is also a large pool of Lifeguards on Call to draw from who make $16 to $22 an hour with no benefits. THEY man the towers and THEY do the lionshare of the rescues.

But the full time guys, well, in the offseason, typically two are in trucks - maybe three - one at CDM, two others are in trucks roaming between the wedge and the SA River. The rest are either doing admin/office work, not driving around....they are not on a TOWER. They are painting towers, ordering uniforms, answering phones ("how's the surf today?), overseeing dispatch, training people on CPR or prepping for Jr. Guards (getting the trailer ready).

So we need those Full Time Lifeguards earning at total, including benefits, of $2,168,011.39 to do this? We need an average of $154,857.95 to paint a lifeguard tower, answer phones, train people in CPR and training Junior Lifeguards?

Obviously not, as City Manager Dave Kiff, the Newport Beach Fire Department Chief, and the Newport Beach Chief Safety Officer had decided as they propose cutting the 13 down to 9.

And as far as I am concerned, this is the furthest thing away from a Safety vs. Pension issue. It’s just cutting some serious, and long overdue, fat from the City.

Ooohhhh…forgot to mention their juicy pensions didn’t I?

Ok, consider that two recently retired Lifeguards now receive in excess of $100k a year in pensions plus medical FOR LIFE. One guard recently retired at age 51 to receive $108,000 a year, plus medical, FOR LIFE.

So don’t feel soo bad for those poor lifeguards.

Also think about this, if you are drowning in Newport Beach waters, would you want a 47 year old full time lifeguard, who normally jockeys an office, or mans the phone, or doing admin/office work to come get you, or would you want a very fit 23 year old Lifeguard-On-Call/UCI water polo player to drag your butt out of the water?

Think David Hasselhoff versus Pamela Anderson?

So by the time I get to retire at the age of, let’s say, 70…that same 70 year old retired Newport Beach Lifeguard would have already been “earning” over $108,000.00 a year from his pension for 20 years.

…and my father didn’t want me to be a lifeguard.

The Kings of Newport Beach

lead·er·ship noun \ˈlē-dər-ˌship\ - Definition of LEADERSHIP :1: the office or position of a leader 2: capacity to lead 3: the act or an instance of leading 4: leaders (the party leadership)

Examples of LEADERSHIP: 1. a politician who lacks leadership 2. What this country needs is the exercise of strong leadership!

The above definition of leadership was taken verbatim from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary.

Over the past week, the City of Newport Beach has been making the news for a couple of reasons, both extremely positive as far as I am concerned. Yet something has been bothering me, actually bumming me out, and it didn’t really occur to me why until this morning.

City Manager Dave Kiff, faced with a serious budget and pension liability crisis, showed true leadership and eliminated 50 City Positions, which includes having to lay off 25 plus current employees. This by itself irks me because I will no longer get to declare that Newport Beach has more City Employees per Resident than any other City…but I digress.

Dave Kiff is doing what truly needs to be done and took what was deemed a Political issue by the Public Employee Unions, and has made it a purely REAL issue. A REAL issue that needs to be addressed and the elimination of City Employee positions is a REAL first step.

Next up, West Newport and the Peninsula have been known as the “War Zone” for many, many years now, so at a recent Newport Beach City Council study session, POLICE OFFICIALS introduced an ordinance restricting “loud and unruly gatherings.” Essentially, if a house parties with 8 or more folks, they will get fined big dollars, with the fines growing up to $8,000 for repeat violations. If you rent and party, then your landlord will be able to evict you in order to avoid getting fined big bucks themselves.

After living right smack dab in the middle of the War Zone for years, I kinda would have liked anything which would have prevented seeing vomit on the sidewalk and trash on my patio (or any combination of the two) every Saturday and Sunday morning …but I again, I digress.

Anyways the point of mentioning those two extremely newsworthy and potentially controversial items is that they came from City Staff and not from our Elected Leaders.

Now I fully understand that it’s our Magnificent Seven City Councilmembers who “instructed” City Staff to come up with ideas to balance the budget, or keep the crazy partying down, but I would have loved seeing the ideas, like them or not, come from who our City elects.

When I think of Leadership, the Costa Mesa City Council majority comes to mind. They were faced with a similar budget and pension crunch like Newport Beach, yet THEY took the lead (as leaders do) in laying off City Employees, and they are now taking the criticism and enjoying the kudos (as leaders do).

And as much as it pains me to say, I think of President Barack Obama. As much as I disagree with what he’s been doing, President Obama still took the lead in getting the soon-to-be repealed Healthcare reforms shoved down America’s throat. It’s difficult not to admire and respect his leadership (but I still don’t…).

The Newport Beach City Council? They are sitting back like the Kings (and Queens) of Newport Beach waiting for City Staff to come up with the GREAT ideas and then inanely commenting on them in the newspapers.

And by letting City Staff come up with these tremendous ideas, they can successfully avoid taking the criticism if they fail.

If, God forbid, a tragedy like what happened in Costa Mesa occurs in Newport Beach because of the layoffs, our Kings and Queens can blame City Manager for coming up with the idea.

If renters and homeowners in West Newport and the Peninsula start revolting at the heavy fines and evictions, our Kings and Queens can blame the Newport Beach Police Department for proposing the ordinance.

But if both succeed, who will take the credit?

It’s good to be the King…

So I leave with a quote from the movie “The American President;”

“In the absence of genuine leadership, they'll listen to anyone who steps up to the microphone. They're so thirsty for it they'll crawl through the desert to a mirage and when they discover there is no water, they will drink the sand.”

Enjoy the sand.

The Next Bubble to Burst

Compared to Mayor Mike Henn, I’m a mid level pencil pusher. He was a CFO for two very large public companies; I’m just a Corporate Controller for small private companies. He filed quarterly 10-Qs to the Securities and Exchange Commission. I file quarterly payroll tax returns to IRS and sales tax returns to the State Board of Equalization. He’s the star Quarterback in the NFL, I’m the third stringer QB in the Arena Football league.

So when I read that based on the Fiscal Year End (FYE) 2009 California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPers) report, the City of Newport Beach has an unfunded pension liability of $134 million dollars, as well as an unfunded $60 million dollar Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB), or Health Insurance et al., liability, I cannot help but wonder. Why isn’t Mayor Henn’s head exploding?

What does all those numbers above mean?

What it means is that if every City Employee, every Police Officer, or every Fireman (or Fireperson) and Lifeguard eligible to retire retired today, the City of Newport Beach would be almost $200 million dollars short on paying for their “Well-Deserved” (former Councilman Don Webb’s paraphrased words) post retirement Pension and Health Insurance benefits for the rest of their lives.

Let me repeat in terms that even a Third Stringer like me can understand.

The City of Newport Beach is $200 million dollars in the hole to pay for the Pension and Health Insurance for all of its present, and future, retired employees.

And that is based on the June 30, 2009 report by CalPers, released in December of 2009, which leads me to a couple of questions.

  1. When did the City of Newport Beach know that their pension liability jumped up 44% from the year before to $134 million dollars? And
  1. Is the City going to do something more than just have the Public Safety Employees, whose contracts expire in December contribute more than just 3.5% (while the City contributes the remaining 96.5%) to their pensions?

With question #1, one cannot help but wonder, after an election season where Pension Liability was a huge topic, where Council candidate Ed Reno brought up privatizing more City Functions (Trash Service as an example), where the size of government was questioned, did the City wait until after the November 2010 elections, 11 months AFTER the report was released, to drop this little tidbit of information?

If we, the voters, would have found out that the City was $200 million dollars in the hole to pay for the bloated, yet “deserved”, pensions and health insurance of its employees, would the election results have been different?

Perhaps.

But couple this with the $128 million dollar loan to build the City Hall/Civic Center, and the City of Newport Beach faces a debt service of over $328 million dollars which will choke even the most robust bank accounts, even the most robust companies.

Is being $328 million dollars in debt a good thing to be during these tough economic times?

Question #2, how far will the City go to alleviate this problem? And how much will the Public Employee Unions concede to prevent this fiscal bubble from inevitably bursting?

Contributing 3.5% to 8% to their own pensions will not work. Having them raise their retirement age from 50 to 55 won’t do anything either.

Only having employees go from the traditional CalPers system to a “defined-contribution” program similar to a 401k, as Mayor Henn suggests, would help, but instead of hoping that it could be done “well down the road,” it needs to be done immediately.

Doing it “well down the road” would be like ordering more lifeboats for the Titanic long after the ship has sunk.

Will the Public Employees, Firefighters, Lifeguards, Police Officers, and Trash guys be willing to dump their juicy pensions for a normal 401k plan like you and I do?

And what will Mayor Henn and the rest of the Newport Beach City Council do if they won’t and “concede” to just contributing 9% to their pensions?

Here’s what I would love to see happen.

-The City Council draws a line in the sand and says that being $328 ($128 million for the City Hall/Civic Center and $200 million in unfunded Pension and OPEB liabilities) million dollars in debt is enough.

-The City Council immediately implements a “Defined-Contribution” program similar to a 401k, and raise the retirement ages to 60 years old.

-If the Unions don’t agree, then let the layoffs begin.

Yes, I repeat, let the layoffs begin.

Just like in Colton, CA and in Camden, NJ.

You read that right, the City Council need to start acting like Fiscal Conservatives (like many claim to be) and take the necessary actions to ensure that the next bubble that bursts isn’t Newport Beach’s.

And Mayor Henn needs to step up to the plate to keep the Newport Beach ship from sinking.

I'm BAAAACCCCKKKK...Maybe.

Hello there. In case you didn't notice...or perhaps you did notice, I've been writing for the Newport Beach Independent. Good? Bad? Indifferent? Didn't notice? Well...I think I'm back here again, but mostly just to re-post my works of genius, or to post those articles which were denied by the Editor.

So there.

We'll see how long this lasts this time.

Thanks

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Newport Mesa Daily Voice

In case you are wondering...I've migrated over to a REAL website...Tom Johnson's Newport Mesa Daily Voice.

Weekly, I'll be writing stuff, lots of it like what I used to blabber about here, but now with a professional editor cleaning my stuff up...

Here's the first one.

Thanks for being here.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Leaf Blowers?

About 10 years ago, we bitterly complained that since
1994 the ubiquitous Leaf Blower had become a common
environmental nuisance. With their use unregulated we
were confronted with gas operated models that made
enough noise to qualify for a Motocross Race at Angel's
Stadium. Then they came out with Electric Models much
later, that once reved up.....were almost as loud as the
gas operated models.

OK, the rumour of the day is that the City of Newport
Beach is looking into banning Leaf Blowers. Finally,
enough people have been offended that it has reached
the NB Council Agenda. Well, Leaf Blowers don't pollute
the environment, but the people behind those Leaf Blowers
can and more likely than not - do! We are sure you have
heard this reasoning before, but before the City Council
of Newport Beach, votes in it's wisdom to completely ban
this egregious vehicle to kill a good phone conversation,
upset the cat or dog, or worst yet dump all that dust
and fertilizer all over the nearest Mercedes - after
just being detailed...let's take another look at the
Leaf Blower issue.

There is little doubt that many people are affected by
the blowing pollen and dust. There is little doubt that
as well that some actually have alergic reactions from
the airborne contaminants. This is a good reason to
control the use of Leaf Blowers - so that they will not
be utilized indicriminantly.

However, what about Palm Trees? Ever heard of them?
Every time one of these beauties has to have the fruit
removed or the palm frawns trimmed....there is sizable
waste to collect and put into the pick-up truck for
transit to the dump. The various pieces left over from
big palms can create a big mess, even for professionals.
This is maybe one reason to crank up the old Leaf Blower
for a few minutes and save both the homeowner and the
gardener hours of labor policing completed project.
Sensible and cost effective use - usually makes sense!

Face it, we find there are reasons for Leaf Blower
use...but in most cases....they are severely over used.
In our old neighborhood complex, the gardeners would
spend way over an hour, two or three days a week....
moving a few leaves from one side of the complex to
the other. Many times pushing them down storm drains
as well. This, in our opinion, was over use at its
worst. Watching gardener helpers spend many hours of
the day walking lazily up and down streets, followed
by a high noise making mini-street sweeper pick-up
truck..which blotted out the local news on TV or radio
...disturbing computer projects, school studies or a
variety of other productive activities. Dealing with
constant airborne pollutants over that period of time
probably requires some regulation.

Completely banning Leaf Blowers may have some costly
unintended consequences however. There can be found
good reasons and uses, as well as some very poor ones.
Finding the correct balance is the preferred course
in this case. Therefore, although we touted a Leaf
Blower ban in the past, after additional consideration,
we now oppose a complete ban, but with some strict
additional regulations.

Severely restricting the use of Leaf Blowers to large
projects and various short spans of use......we could
certainly support, however.

Hopefully, the City of Newport Beach....will agonize
a little longer than usual - before they vote.....and
ask that City Staff come up with additional regulations
that are "not too complicated", "but fair and reasonable"
- that will correct the current abuses of the use of Leaf
Blowers without adding a complete ban. Obviously, Gas
Operated Models, we would suggest, are out! Restricting
use to low decibel Electric Models will also help save
the pet's ears and not drive the Senior Citizens too
crazy, if applied judiciously.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

But the Newport Beach City Council LOVES the Unions!

Well...I was at Monday's Republican Party of Orange County's Central Committee meeting.

And I got to hear Chairman Scott Baugh's call to action.

His Mandate.

His "Throwing down the Gauntlet."

His Calling for a Revolution.

I liked it, but as Chip Hanlon points out in his Red County blog post, "A Few Folks who Might Not Have Loved Baugh's Speech" rings true...especially in Newport Beach.

Now first off, Chip writes that there are generally three types of reactions.
  1. Those who wholeheartedly supported it
  2. Those who remain skeptical that anything will really change
  3. Those electeds who have taken union money and won't like this sunlight
I would probably call myself a mix between #1 & #2 because I support it and Scott completely, but I'm not too sure how one part of his speech will work...especially in Newport Beach.

Chairman Baugh states that if a candidate wants the endorsement from the Republican Party of Orange County, he or she CANNOT receive contributions from Public Employee Unions.

Now, anyone left here who has read my dribble over the years has known for my contempt of of Newport Beach's VERY VERY VERY active Police and Fire Unions (they like to be called Associations) and the Newport Beach City Council's lack of...guts (I had another word typed, then deleted it) against them.

For a refresher (here, here, here, here).

The OC Register Editorial board wrote about the Newport Beach City Council's fear of the Unions here.

The Daily Pilot here.

David Bahnsen here.

So I spent some time away from my Playstation 3 this morning to do some research.

Ready?

In the 2004 Newport Beach City Council Election:
  • Former Mayor Steve Rosansky received a $1076.00 Independent Expenditure from the Police Union.
In the 2006 Newport Beach City Council Election:
  • The Police and Fire Unions spent a total of $31807.65 in support of their Endorsed Candidates.
  • Former Mayor Don Webb - $500 cash ($500 Contribution limits in NB), $4128.03 in IE money.
  • Former Mayor Ed Selich - $1000 cash, $4128.03 in IE
  • Mayor Keith Curry - $1000 cash, $4128.03 in IE
  • Former Mayor Pro Tem Leslie Daigle - $500 cash, $3381.03 in IE
  • Mayor Pro Tem Mike Henn - $1000 cash, $4128.03 in IE
They also contributed to Council Candidate Barbara Venezia (who left the race early) and to Former Green Party, and current DTS Nancy Gardner.

In the 2008 Newport Beach City Council race:
  • Mayor Keith Curry - $500 cash, $6015.07 IE
  • Former Mayor Steve Rosansky - $500 cash, $6015.07 IE
  • Former Mayor Ed Selich - $6015.08 IE.
In the past three Newport Beach City Council elections, the Police and Fire Unions ENDORSED and SPENT $51,928.87 to help shape a Union Friendly City Council.

The past two elections? $50,852.87

So what do we do now?

Almost all of those folks listed above requested, and received, the Republican Party of Orange County endorsement in those elections.

Does Scott Baugh's decree now mean that they won't receive the Endorsement anymore?

Does it mean that they can say the standard:

“While I commend Scott for reminding Republicans of the negative impact unions have had on the state budget, I appreciate the role public safety plays in our community,” she (State Senator Mimi Walters), said. “Their support of me has never influenced my decisions.”

I don't know.

The main problem here in Newport Beach is that the City Council election candidates, and winners, usually RABIDLY seek the Police and Fire Unions (which along with the Daily Pilot make up the Three Endorsements Jewels in Newport Beach.)

And the interesting part then?

Endorsements from the Republican Party of Orange County typically come at the beginning of summer, Newport Beach Union Endorsements come late Summer.

Does the OCGOP then wait?

Let me give you an example from 2008.
  • Mayor Keith Curry and former Mayor Steve Rosansky were endorsed by the Republican Party of Orange County in early Summer.
  • They were endorsed by the Unions later that Summer.
  • The Unions contributed to their campaigns in August (Keith) and September (Steve).
  • The Unions then spent about $18 GRAND in the end of September.
  • The report for these dollars weren't due until October.
  • Which was when the Republican Party of Orange County spent $16,965.72 to support Steve Rosansky
  • The Republican Party of Orange County spent $17,070.91 in support of Keith Curry and $16,622.28 against Keith's opponent (who wasn't endorsed by the Union and who was one the Newport Harbor Republican Women leaders).
Would the Republican Party of Orange County have endorsed or spent $50,658.91 in support of Union Backed City Council candidates had they known?

That is why I'm skeptical.

However, while skeptical, I'm still hopeful.

Hopeful that this means that the Republican Newport Beach City Council candidates will covet the Republican Party of Orange County endorsement more then the Unions, especially in a predominately Republican City.

Hopeful that while the Newport Beach City Council says they are republican (small r) they will start acting like Republicans.

And hopeful that our most Republican member of the City Council will try not to put the City of Newport Beach into Hundreds of Millions of Debt for a new White Elephant (sorry, had to change topics real quick.)

Friday, November 20, 2009

Who will watch the store now that he is gone?

Dr. Jan Vandersloot.....was our personal hero! He
marched across difficult terrain, when going another
way may have been easier. He applied himself each
day with a renewed fervor.....a renewal of spirit
that was infectious. He wanted to make people aware
that San Diego and other places around our nation....
may not be doing the right thing. He asked us to attend
meetings with him. He stood tall when no one else would.
Dr. Jan's solitary presence, at not only City Council
Meetings, Country Boards and State Commissions told of
someone truly dedicated to a better world. Someone who
would show by example; rather than just shouting from the
roof tops or spouting off for an uninterested audience!

Some people in life that serve as role models are later
to be named for streets, parks, open space, buildings
and even sometimes with a bronze statue. What they have
accomplished could be of little consequence...perhaps
family or powerful friends fronted the cash for these
endeavors. So it would be easy to be cynical about the
process of being grateful to those that have served
without a desire to be remembered. What was in it for
them? "A better world!" comes to mind when the name of
Dr. Jan Vandersloot is mentioned!

Dr. Jan Vandersloot, marched ahead with facts, figures,
study and a targeted desire......to move things forward
and to save our "Quality of Life" for not only our
progeny but those that would survive the years with
memories of wonder and beauty that once existed before
"Redevelopment or Naked Progress" that would take our
community and make it into something that was without
beauty or at worst, simply unlivable.

Water quality, Open Space and the beauty of trees and
plants.......were protected by Dr. Jan and his warrior
mentality. He stood tall, he asked the tough questions
and he offered solutions. He did all this....without pay
or self-aggrandizing purpose. He did it, because he knew
that if no one did it....the worst could happen and most
likely leave us depleted in spirit and in the beauty of
our environment!

Dr. Jan Vandersloot should be remembered. Should be
honored by our City, our County and our State. His
passing on November 5th, 2009 came too early. The people
standing in line to replace his tireless energy are not
only too few - but without his amazing knowledge! We
need to honor his memory with a Park,a street or Open
Space..marked by his name!

Thank you Dr. Jan, but the Lord has taken you too early.
We needed you to stick around a lot longer. We needed
for you to bring that tireless energy back to the Dias,
time after time - to protect us!

To his family and friends, the citizens of Newport Beach,
Orange County and California...and even the patients of
his caring, healing Dermatology practice - God bless us
all. We will remember you Dr. Jan and do our best to
walk a tiny step or two in your shadow!

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

In Memoriam Jan Vandersloot, MD


And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap, if we faint not. Galatians 6:9

No one exemplified these words better than Jan Vandersloot, medical doctor, environmentalist, and family man. He was generous with his time and his money, and we are thankful to him as well as to Cheryl, Jon and Tiffany.

I first met Jan about twenty years ago, though I’d seen his numerous and eloquent letters to the editor before that. I was a city planner at Newport Beach and he called about illegal fill of a wetland. Someone in the office said “that Dr. Vandersloot” always had some complaint. Still, I arranged to meet Jan at the site along with a biologist and, lo and behold, a wetland was being illegally filled.

After that, I got many calls from Jan. Sometimes he’d be reporting habitat damage, or illegal dumping. I learned that when “that Dr. Vandersloot” called, it was something I really needed to check out. If he had a complaint it was well-founded and well-researched. Unlike some residents who called regularly, Jan was concerned about all areas of the city and beyond, not just matters within a block or two of his house.

Sometimes he was just looking for information. For Jan, there was no such thing as too much information.

Years later, after I’d left the City and was involved in various causes, many at the prodding of Jan, my house was overrun with environmental impact reports (EIRs) and other studies. Jan stopped by about some project. I was mortified at the boxes of documents spilling into the living room. Jan was delighted.

Jan had a way of pulling people into his causes. Bolsa Chica, Ocean Outfall Group, San Diego Creek, trees on the Peninsula. He put so much into so many causes, how could you not help at least a little? Almost daily there’d be e-mail from Jan with calls to action, research requests, or outlines of potential strategies for ongoing projects.

As he toiled to end the Orange Count Sanitation District’s waiver from federal clean water law, he’d ask not IF you’d attend any meetings to speak against the waiver, but WHICH meetings in which cities you’d attend. Eventually Jan, or in rare cases a surrogate, spoke before every city council and sanitary district in Orange County, usually with a few others in tow, but alone if need be.

Jan didn’t care if he was the only one to stand up and fight for something. If it was the right thing to do, he was there.

It wasn’t all just hearings and meetings. I especially appreciate the work he did at Fairview Park. Jan advocated for the park at hearings and also weeded and planted plants, sometimes with a group, sometimes with just one other person, like Gil Collins, sometimes alone.Though I’d been involved in Fairview earlier on, soon Jan surpassed me in his knowledge and dedication to improving habitat at the park. I’d be out for a hike and there was Jan, clearing away the anise choking out native species. Seeing his hard work, I’d go back to my car for an extra bag to pick up trash along the way. How could I not?

We distributed flyers at election time. Of course, if you and Jan covered opposite sides of a street, you really had to hustle. With his long legs he’d finish the distance long before you.

Jan really loved to celebrate the big wins. And he hated to lose. After a setback, he’d be seeking other strategies. Was there a way to appeal? Another agency involved? Should we litigate? Any other options?

Jan just did not give up. If we’d finally run out of options, he’d be planning how we could handle a similar situation “next time”. Unfortunately, now there is no “next time” with Jan.

Today, we are able to reap what Jan so diligently sowed and tended: Open space at Bolsa Chica, cleaner beaches, wetlands, trees, and habitat in various areas. What a tremendous legacy!

Perhaps an even greater legacy is the army of activist that Jan has encouraged and mentored over the years. Now we must continue in well-doing, that we and others may reap in the years to come. How could we not?

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Wow! I Told You So???

It's not too often when a highly respected "member" of the community agrees with a very small, yet very vocal, part of the community.

For years now, residents of West Newport Beach and the Balboa Peninsula have been complaining about, and opening their wallets to fight, the Sober Living/Rehab homes which littered through the community.

The claim was that the Residents of these Sober Living/Rehab homes were thieves and destroyed property.

The claim was that the Residents of these Sober Living/Rehab homes were disruptive.

The claim was that the Residents of these Sober Living/Rehab homes were disrespectful and rude to their neighbors.

The claim was that the Residents of these Sober Living/Rehab homes didn't belong in residential neighborhoods.

Denys Obermann and the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach spent lots and lots of money to get the City of Newport Beach to do something about it.

The Sober Living/Rehab homes hired some seriously BIG GUNS to defend themselves.

The City of Newport Beach's response?

Tepid to Ceremonial.

And realistically, as the 2008 City Council showed, that's how the voters felt about the Sober Living/Rehab "patients (and I use that word VERY lightly...)" living in residential areas.

A Council member was accused of profiting off the Sober Living/Rehab Homes.

And while he may have lost in the districts affected by them, the rest of the City cared less, indicating that they were more concerned that he had a house in disrepair, for many years, and that he seemed to push his weight around to keep it in disrepair.

And he was overwhelmingly re-elected.

Well...finally.

Finally, a highly respected "member" of the Community has echoed, and VALIDATED the sentiments of West Newport Beach, Balboa Peninsula, and the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach.

Finally, a Company, who's President's endorsement is highly coveted and sought after by Potential City Councilmembers.

I can still remember Mayor Pro-Tem Keith Curry quoting their President's words when he was on the campaign trail.

It's all in the title of the Orange County Register article.


Hospital bars drug rehab patients from A.A. meetings


Read it.

Study it.

Here's are some excerpts for those too lazy to click

"Effectively immediately, sober living homes and substance abuse treatment centers that drop off van and bus loads of residents to attend this meeting will be asked not to do so," says the letter. "We ask that you find other meetings to attend."

"Unfortunately, there has been an ongoing history of disregard for the property and policies of Hoag Hospital," according to the letter from Dotty Dozal of the Hoag Chemical Dependency Recovery Center.

"These behaviors include: theft, destruction of property, smoking on campus, profanity, congregating in groups outside of the building rather than attending the meeting, gathering in restricted areas and other disruptive behaviors."

Wow...

Sounds just like ALL OF THE COMPLAINTS THE RESIDENTS HAD ABOUT THESE REHAB "RESIDENTS."

Perhaps the Sky was falling...

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Halloween Massacre at China Cove

Bet you thought that title was some kind of joke. Unfortunately not.

Akin to what occurred in West Newport when some reprobates decided to bulldoze the dunes, someone has hacked away a fair amount of vegetation at China Cove, including native plants (pictures). Word has it the Newport Beach Police have apprehended the miscreant.

Could it be the same guy that’s been chopping down trees elsewhere, including Costa Mesa parks? Is he just a spoiled brat who feels he has the right to alter public property to suit his convenience and/or enhance his own property value? News flash chainsaw man: You are not the center of the universe.

It’s hard to understand what this jerk was thinking. Were the plants blocking his view? One would think that any views blocked by the massacred plants would also be blocked by Kerckhoff Marine Lab.

What was next on his agenda? Was he planning on disassembling Kerckhoff and burning it in the fire rings piece by piece? Oh, wait. Council Member Gardner’s getting rid of those.

Never mind. If some predictions as to climate change are to be believed, it will all be under water in a few years.