Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Ok...A Step in the Right Direction

I'm a bit perplexed by the contents of this Daily Pilot article. Councilman Keith Curry proposed a Charter Amendment to give the Newport Beach voters the thumbs up/down on Employee Pension hikes.

Ok. That sounds good. But I have a few questions (mostly due to my ignorance of how the City functions):

1. I thought the City Council approves employee raises and their pension raises and terms. Is this Charter Amendment in place so that the voters can "overturn" these pension raises and terms decided upon by the Voter-Elected City Council?

2. Is this so the heavily Police and Fire Union backed City Council doesn't have to worry about suffering through the wrath of the Unions who spend thousands and thousands of dollars on supporting their City Council slates (In 2006 Fire supported ALL the winners, Police won all except Barbara Venezia), since the decision to vote down the Employee Pensions increases would not be in the hands of their City Council. The Union-Backed City Council says yes, the voters (who also voted for the City Council) would say no?

3. I was under the impression that we wanted a Representative Form of Government where we trust of City Council to make a majority of the decisions for us and that City Councils typically don't like Ballot Box Governance. I thought that is why some of the voters and the City Council didn't like Greenlight I, Greenlight II and the City Hall in the Park initiative?

Councilman Curry wanting to limit the Employee Pension hikes is a good thing and definitely a step in the right direction (as well as being a very Conservative things to want/do), but it's certainly different that what County Supervisor John Moorlach is doing to combat the Unions. I just would hope that the City Councilmembers (who are voted in) would be fiscally responsible enough and the Gatekeepers of our City's purse strings so that the residents WOULD NOT have to get involved and reverse what the City Council approves.

Follow Up Question - This just occurred to me...if this go to the ballot, can you IMAGINE HOW MUCH MONEY THE POLICE AND FIRE UNIONS WILL SPEND TO DEFEAT IT? Oh boy, that would be some serious dough.

1 comments:

Ron & Anna Winship said...

"Lead, follow or get out of the way!"..is what Lee Iacoca said in
an old Chrysler Commercial. In
this case Councilman Curry seems
to be "leading" and it is very
attractive. In addition, to not
appearing to be the "naying nellie"
Curry attempting to preempt the
various Union concerns that no one
will want to be Firefighters or
Police officers in Newport Beach
without a 3% at 50 will virtually
no caps! The people indeed should
say that Officers or Fire personnel that retire on cushy
and in many case well earned retirements...should not be able
to "double dip" by either going
out on disability or taking full
time consultanting positions doing
the same thing with another Police
or Fire Dept. after retirement.
They should either, keep their
retirement - or - discontinue their retirement and take the
new position. After they indeed
do retire...for real...then they
should have the opportunity to
pick up where they left off,
on their "delayed retirement benefits".